Zipless in Nevada

In  Erica Jong’s 1973 novel, Fear of Flying, we were introduced to the “zipless fuck,” a sexual encounter involving two previously unacquainted persons with no emotional commitment.

In Grounded, a play by George Brant, a young woman in an Air Force flight suit tracks a terrorist on the ground 8000 miles away. She’s “flying” a missile-armed drone from her air-conditioned trailer in the Nevada desert. She is prosecuting America’s zipless war.

As an ex-Marine fighter pilot, I resist the conflation of jet pilot and drone operator. Real fighter pilots strap in, light the fire, pull G’s, land on aircraft carriers, and swap sea stories in the Ready Room. In Grounded, the unnamed pilot feels the same way. She’s a hard charging, adrenaline-fueled F-16 driver, but following maternity leave she finds herself assigned as a UAV (unmanned air vehicle) “pilot” in a windowless trailer in the Nevada desert. She is not happy with the assignment. She misses the excitement. She misses “the blue,” but war is changing and she has to deal with it.

Creech Air Force Base is the home of the Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Battlelab. It sits forty-five minutes northwest of the Las Vegas Strip, in the middle of the desert, where real “pilots” flying unmanned drones reconnoiter the battlefields of Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, and Syria and track dangerous insurgents who use these remote locations to evade their enemies.

Today the Air Force has more unmanned drones than manned aircraft in its arsenal. Its use of drones has increased exponentially since America’s wars in the Middle East began 15 years ago. According to Grégoire Chamayou in his 2013 book, A Theory of the Drone, the number of patrols by American armed drones increased by 1200% from 2004 to 2011.

Drone piloting is the ultimate video game, and the Air Force is now acknowledging that it doesn’t take an F-16 pilot to fly one. Today’s cadre of drone pilots now includes rigorously screened enlisted men and women as well as combat trained pilots. It takes two years and $2,600,000 to train a fighter pilot but only ten weeks and $175,000 to train a drone pilot. You do the math.

Nevertheless, despite the fact that “the threat of death has been removed” unmanned vehicle pilots have a surprisingly high burnout rate. Long boring days in a darkened trailer looking at a computer screen has its downside. Pilots have always said their lives are filled with hours of boredom interspersed with moments of stark terror, and while physical danger is missing in that trailer, the job exacts its own emotional toll.

Grounded is only one of several stage and film treatments of the subject. In the film Good Kill (2014) Ethan Hawke plays a drone pilot who questions the ethics of firing missiles in Afghanistan from his trailer in the Nevada desert, and last year (2016) Helen Mirren and Alan Rickman posed similar ethical questions about civilian casualties, chain of command, personal responsibility and other political questions relative to drone warfare in Eye in the Sky.

In the play, our earth-bound “pilot,” though disappointed by her new assignment at first, makes peace with it and takes comfort in living “normally” with her husband and child in Las Vegas. She reminds us again and again that “the threat of death has been removed.” She finds it comforting but ultimately unsatisfying. Soon, life in “the Chair Force” starts to wear her down. She can’t talk to her husband about her work and finds herself unable to isolate the two lives. She begins to humanize the images she sees on her computer screen. Ultimately, like Eye in the Sky, it is a child that causes her ultimate breakdown. She imagines her own child in the crosshairs on her screen.

In a discussion with friends after the play I confessed to having misgivings over the fact that the playwright cast a woman as the pilot. Artistically it works. Mahria Zook, the actress, owned the stage and our attention for 90 minutes without an intermission, displaying a range of emotions from joy to anger to disappointment and ultimately to madness. She was exhausting and impressive.

So what is my problem? I have a feeling that casting a woman in the role made it easier for the audience to relate to the character’s emotional turbulence. Is it because I think women are more emotional? Is it because I believe women are weaker? I don’t think so, but I can’t be sure. All I know is that I was a little distracted and thought the playwright was giving us an easier emotional connection. It would surely have been a different play with a man in the role. Not better, just different.

My experience may be sexist. When I was flying F8’s and A4’s there were no women fighter pilots, and I may have some unacknowledged prejudice about a woman’s ability to yank and crank with the boys. My friend, Bob Gandt, wrote a profile of the Navy’s first woman F-18 pilot and the controversy surrounding her qualifications and eventual death on a carrier approach in his book Bogeys and Bandits. That was 24 years ago. I don’t know the status of women fighter pilots today. Like all pioneers, the first women were deer in the headlights. I hope the culture has changed, but in a testosterone-fueled Ready Room, preparing for a catapult launch, there are bound to be some unreconstructed good old boys.

In the same way that Erica Jong’s zipless fuck wasn’t really free of emotional content, the real life UAV pilots in the Nevada desert often feel conflicted as human targets appear in real life situations – family gatherings, strangers in field of fire, children playing in the street – as they prepare to launch a missile. In a world where young people grow up playing video games, controlling missile-armed drones is the pinnacle – but as the play and movies reveal this game is fraught with moral questions and emotional ups and downs.

The next time you’re looking for spellbinding entertainment, check out Eye in the Sky or Good Kill, good films that explore the moral, psychological, and political implications of our zipless war. If you’re lucky you might find even find a local production of Grounded and experience those feelings in a live theater performance.

Art does illuminate.

(Special thanks to Sara Keats, the dramaturg at SPT, for some of this information)

 

Escaping the Madness

Blue sky, hot weather, cactus, friendly natives, a sensational espresso bar, true Mexican food, and well-maintained bike trails. Tucson is the perfect getaway from the rainy, windy, chilly winter in Seattle. Never mind that we drove 4000 miles to get there and back. It was worth it.

With the electile dysfunction of 2016 and the media’s all-consuming interest in Trump and his band of proto-conservatives, Russian spies, Cypriot money launderers, rapacious Wall Street foreclosers, Alt-Right apologists, de-constructers, de-conflicters, feckless co-conspirators, and ne’er do well family members, it was a relief to struggle out of the swamp and disappear into the real landscape of America.

Like many of our friends, M and I usually jump on an airplane to get as far away from home as possible. We like foreign travel, exotic cuisine, and the sound of other languages, but in the last 18 months we have taken four driving trips in the US – South Florida and the Keys, DC and the Civil War battlefields, Oregon and Northern California, and Tucson and the Southwest – 12 weeks in all. In the process we’ve become devoted road warriors. Interstate highways are the arteries of our surface transportation system but local roads, off the Interstate grid, are its capillaries. That’s where America lives and where you can see it best.

This is California’s central valley in March. It doesn’t get much greener or more beautiful than this.

There’s nothing like a road trip to clear the head. This is the Oregon coast  near the California border.

A quick stop at Indian Wells to check out the best tennis tournament in America.

And, eventually, our arrival in Tucson where we rode, ate, and drank for 10 deliciously hot days.

This margarita and asada en mesquite at Cafe Poca Cosa was our last meal in Tucson and worth every one of the 4000 miles.

Leaving Tucson we drove north and finished the trip off with four national parks – Mesa Verde, Escalante, Arches, and Canyonlands – and a visit with family in Salt Lake City. This view is from Dead Horse Point State Park in Moab.

There’s a lot to be said for a winter vacation, especially in the midst of the turmoil and exhaustion of Trump’s first 100 days. But, turmoil and exhaustion are not good reasons to relax our vigilance. This democracy was hard won and can be hard to maintain, especially when greed, conflicts of interest, and lack of empathy for the population at large are involved. Watch the referendum in Turkey this weekend if you don’t believe it.

“Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty.”

(often attributed to Thomas Jefferson but the real provenance is unknown)

 

Old Age and Politics

“Do you know how lucky you are to be old?” This pointed question is asked of a character in a new novel called Our Short History. It’s the story of a woman dying of ovarian cancer who’s writing a letter for her 6-year-old son to read when he turns 18. Read the interview with its author on NPR’s Weekend Edition (Saturday, April 1, 2017). She’s fascinating and so is the story.

More to the point on a personal note, I don’t think I’ve ever seen old and lucky in the same sentence, but it’s true. Most of us have the same familiar complaints about getting older. We don’t see it as a blessing. We kvetch about our aches and pains, lament the doctor visits, wish we could still run marathons, and feel compassion for friends leaving the homes they love for  “retirement communities.” The other day a friend told me when he gets together with peers the conversation almost always begins with an “organ recital” – a list of all their current health problems.

Ms. Grodstein shines a light on the positive aspects of age. She’s reminds those of us who have lived long and well of our good fortune.

Today, M is 20 years older than her mother was when she died of ovarian cancer, and I’m 5 years older than my father was when he died during a heart by-pass operation. If you’re reading this, you’ve probably had some close calls that could have gone either way, but you survived. I don’t “feel” old but I’ll be 80 this year. I’m in the zone.

Nevertheless, I feel lucky to be living in the moment. It may well be the most exciting time in modern American political history and I don’t want to miss any part of it. I want to see how it plays out. I want to know if Donald J. Trump will self-destruct? Will he do something totally crazy like preemptively strike North Korea? Will Congress turn against him? Will there be a palace coup? Will he be impeached? I have renewed energy and focus because the times are so volatile. I think about the future, not mine, but my grandchildren’s. It’s problematic. It could go either way.

_____

So far, the Age of Trump is the story of the gang that couldn’t shoot straight. They’ve been shooting at anything that moves or tweets. We need to take their guns and Twitter accounts away and put some adults in charge.

Where in God’s name were they when this cabinet was put together? I’m reminded of the line in Raiders of the Lost Ark; “Why did it have to be snakes?” This White House is full of snakes. There are a couple of adults, mostly military men, at the table, but it’s full of little snakes like Stevie Miller and Ezra Cohen-Watnick who want to play with the big boys but don’t have the chops, and big snakes like Wilber Ross, Tom Price, and Steve Bannon, the real Dark Knight, who sends Little Stevie out on Sunday morning to test the waters and snarl at the cameras while delivering empty threats about keeping dangerous foreigners out of the country.

Recent events have been a mixed blessing. I love the “now” excitement of a good joke or mystery and the Trump administration is rife with both. There’s the paranoid, pathological liar at the helm. There are his connections to the Evil Empire (many and murky), the trophy princess in the NY Tower, missing tax returns, the rise and fall of Steve Bannon, Sebastian Gorka’s fraudulent Hungarian counter-intelligence credentials, Erik Prince’s clandestine hook-up in the Seychelles, the Frequent Flier diplomacy of Jared Kushner, the empty portfolio of Rex Tillerson (chosen Secretary of State because “he looks the part”), the rape of the EPA by Scott Pruitt, the Inspector Clouseau antics of Devin Nunes and the House Intelligence Committee (oxymoron), the color of Sean Spicer’s suit (how inappropriate), and The Donald’s defense of Bill O’Reilly. So many jokes and mysteries to choose from.

_____

But, last week there was a sliver of light; I was encouraged on Tuesday morning when H.R. McMaster, the National Security Advisor, booted Bannon off the National Security Council’s principles committee. That was one for the grown ups. The next day there was a Bannon/Kushner dust up where Big Steve called globe-girdling Jared a “Democrat.” Big mistake. Steve, you don’t want to be pissing off the 45th President’s son-in-law. Remember what happened to Chris Christie?

Then, amidst all the White House turmoil, a real crisis arrived in the form of a horrific nerve gas attack on Syrian men, women, and children – all non-combatants.

Thanks be to God it didn’t happen in the first two weeks of the Trump presidency when Flynn was talking about Hillary’s child trafficking ring and Puddy Pudzer was defending his spousal abuse while trying to explain the “slutberger” marketing campaign at Carl’s Jr. The new administration was up to its ears then.

Fortunately, the grown-ups took control of the Syrian situation over the weekend, and Friday night American firepower, in the form of 59 Tomahawk missiles, devastated the Syrian airfield where the poison gas attack originated. America delivered a “proportional” response that is drawing good reviews from our allies and rebukes from Russia and Iran. Kudos to Trump for taking the adults’ advice. H.R. McMaster and James Mattis took charge while Steve Bannon was licking his wounds in the Executive Washroom and DJT was showing off to the Premier of China at Mar al Lago.

It can only be hoped that, unlike his speech to the joint houses of Congress, he doesn’t Tweet some crazy conspiratorial nonsense and spoil the appearance of good judgment and presidential decisiveness.

_____

Yes, I do know how lucky I am to be old. Dickens opening lines in The Tale of Two Cities is eerily applicable to what’s happening today:

It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness, it was the epoch of belief, it was the epoch of incredulity, it was the season of Light, it was the season of Darkness, it was the spring of hope, it was the winter of despair, we had everything before us, we had nothing before us, we were all going direct to Heaven, we were all going direct the other way – in short, the period was so far like the present period, that some of its noisiest authorities insisted on its being received, for good or for evil, in the superlative degree of comparison only.

It’s a great time to be alive.

The Self-Sovereign and Politics

I’m so sorry that Saul Bellow is dead. The 1976 Nobel Prize winning author of Herzog and Henderson the Rain King would have been the perfect writer for Trump: The Novel. Cited at the Nobel ceremony for his “human understanding and subtle analysis of contemporary culture,” he might have used the 45th President’s antics to give us another great picaresque novel.

After all, Bellow’s protagonist, Moses E. Herzog, is a lot like Donald J. Trump. Unhinged and lonely, he tries to connect with and make sense of the world by writing letters to anyone and everyone. If the novel had been written in 2016, Herzog would have Tweeted. It’s much simpler and easier. 140 characters. No stamps. No trips to the Post Office.

I have the first scene of Trump: The Novel etched clearly in my mind:

It’s 6 a.m. on Saturday morning. The White House is quiet. Melania, the fairy princess, is 226 miles to the north in The Tower. Ivanka and Jared departed the White House just before sunset to observe Shabbat at their DC pied-‘a-terre.  

Donald has been up since 3 a.m. The Secret Service is on alert. He’s roaming the empty halls with his unsecured Android at the ready, and contrary to what Sean Spicer reported, he does have a bathrobe – and he’s wearing it. It’s a blue velour job with the bogus, Trump coat-of-arms covering the entire breast pocket. The hair net he wears to bed is carefully stowed in the bedside table.

As he wanders the hallways of “the residence,” he checks and rechecks the television monitors. Is Fox and Friends Weekend reporting anything important or salacious he can Tweet about. His Twitter finger is itchy and the normal gatekeepers, Ivanka and Jared, aren’t around to monitor his output. He loves Saturday. It can be lonely and boring, but he’s liberated from oversight and free to Tweet. The kids just don’t understand. They’re looking over his shoulder Monday through Friday. They’re suffocating him when they’re around, but this is Saturday – his day to roam freely.

It’s tempting to go on, but the fantasy novel is too close to reality. Saturday Night Live does it better, but even they stretch to satirize. Real life is interfering with late night comedy.

_____

My cousin, Russ, is an executive coach. He’s been working with the 777 leadership group at Boeing, helping them create effective teams and communication skills. In response to my last blog post, he sent me his analysis of DJT based on Jean Piaget’s work and follow up research done on adult mental development.

Piaget

Russ’ assessment is that Trump “is still operating at a pre-adolescent form of mind called ‘self-sovereign.’ The self-sovereign sees others as tools and extensions of his own ego. Others are there to be manipulated, not treated as individuals with their own wants, needs, and points of view.” The self-sovereign is a case of arrested development. Trump, by this analysis, lacks the ability to think at a level sufficient to the challenges of the presidency and at age 70 his prospect for further development is slim… especially under the stress conditions of his role.

I think Russ is correct and it’s alarming. Trump is such an easy target, a soft, flabby one for liberal democrats (small “d”), but he is a scary cog in the worldwide tectonic shift toward autocracy. The question, perhaps raised seriously for the first time since the early days of the republic, is can our institutions withstand this assault on its democratic underpinnings. Will it survive Steve Bannon and the anti-globalists. Will it endure or cave under pressure to reorganize and realign with a new world order?

Words matter, and some, like “liberal” and “conservative” raise hackles from those who assign pejorative connotations to the one they don’t align with. But, at the risk of raising hackles it’s worth noting that there is a difference between “liberal democracy” and “democracy.” Russia, Hungary, and Turkey are “democracies.” They have “popularly” elected leaders, elected legislative bodies, and are ostensibly ruled by a set of laws. But, they’re hollow democratic shells that don’t tolerate dissent or opposition political parties.

The Road Ahead

Ironically, as recently as 1991 the Deputy Director of the State Department’s Policy Planning Staff, Francis Fukuyama, wrote that “a true global culture has emerged centering around technologically driven economic growth and the capitalist social relations necessary to produce and sustain it.” Fukuyama envisioned a positive direction to its then current history, demonstrated by the collapse of authoritarian regimes of right and left and their replacement (in many but not all cases) by liberal governments. He saw global movement in a positive direction. (See Fukuyama, The End of History and the Last Man, reissue edition 2006)

He was dead wrong. He was encouraged by the demise of the Soviet empire and changes in the Chinese economic system, but the vacuum created by the fall of the Berlin Wall and the breakup of the Soviet state is now filled with anti-globalists. Putin in Russia. Orban in Hungary. Erdogan in Turkey. El-Sisi in Egypt and strong autocratic, anti-globalist, movements in France (Marine Le Pen), Netherlands (Geert Wilders), and Angela Merkel’s challengers in Germany.

Arnold Toynbee, in his seminal Study of History cautioned that historians should be “chary of forecasting the outcome of the Western civilization’s latter-day attempts to devour its contemporaries.” Fukuyama should have paid more attention to Toynbee.

What to make of Donald Trump? Is he a tool? Is he Steve Bannon’s dupe? Did he think he was running for student body president only to wake up on November 9, 2016 to find himself the most powerful person in the world? All of the above may be true. I just know that he isn’t up to the job, and like the drift toward autocracy it doesn’t bode well for real democrats – Americans on both sides of the divide that believe in good faith, respect for institutions, a belief in civic participation, tolerance, and the rule of law. This fight isn’t about policy differences; it’s about character, republican ideals, and human dignity.

 

 

 

Critical Thinking and Politics

Like many Americans I am struggling with how to think about politics in the Age of Trump. I know my own mind – the policies I favor and the personalities I respect – but I’m bewildered by the otherness of the whole situation, the new president, his cabinet, and most of all the American electorate.

Is this, as many have said, categorically different than the political landscape of the past 241 years? Are we going from a proscenium stage to guerrilla street theater? Maybe that’s not the right metaphor. Is this war? Is this a game? Is this reality television? How can we best frame what’s happening to our body politic in the Age of Trump.

I like to keep it simple – not simplistic – but simple, and when I think about politics in America today. I’m convinced the problem, and the answer, can be boiled down to something as simple as basic education.

Eighteen years ago when I got involved with policy at Seattle Public Schools, I told M that “knowledge” was going to be less important in the future than knowing where to get it. Critical thinking has always been the goal of education, but things changed with the advent of the information age. I told her that it would no longer be possible to get by with a knowledge of history, science, mathematics, and language, that the core elements of a broad based education would still be important, but education’s role in the future would be to teach students to select their sources of information, evaluate their credibility, and use that vetted information to guide them in their choices.

Marine Major General James Mattis, our new Secretary of Defense, has a personal library of more than 7,000 volumes. He is a student of history. He has been in combat. He has led men in battle. He is quiet, informed, and well spoken. I trust him. I don’t know if I will agree with his decisions as Secretary of Defense, but I know those decisions will be reasoned and in accordance with a considered world view.

Donald J. Trump does not read, and his ability to explain what he means is limited by a small adjective-heavy vocabulary. He has difficulty expressing himself in words. His favorites are “tremendous,” “huge,” “disastrous,” “very, very good,” and “incredible.” He watches television and has made it clear that cable news, Fox News in particular, is a credible, reliable source of information on which to base his decisions as Commander in Chief.

This is crazy. With all the resources and expertise of the government at his disposal, the 45th President of the United States uses a cable news outlet as his go-to source for information. Based on my assessment of his critical thinking skills combined with a hair trigger for impulsive behavior, I don’t trust him to make good decisions for me or the country. Mattis, yes. Trump no. I’m using Mattis and Trump as surrogates (America’s favorite new word) to make a larger point about what’s happened to our political and electoral process.

____

Here’s the problem: a large segment of our electorate, on both the right and left, have lost the ability to evaluate the credibility of their sources and make decisions based on rational, evidence-based material. Scientists are guided by their research, data, and the evidence it produces. Why is that not the standard in the murky world of politics?

In days of yore, pre-Internet, pre-cable news, pre-demise of local newspapers, the majority of the electorate got its news from a few primary sources – broadcast television and radio news (ABC, NBC, CBS, PBS, NPR), daily newspapers, Time, Newsweek, and some vetted political magazines like National Review and Weekly Standard (conservative) or The Nation and New York Review of Books (liberal).

We all read pretty much the same sources and found support for our positions somewhere within the boundaries of the established norms of those sources. The political parties had core differences – small government and lower taxes (GOP) vs. big government and share the wealth programs (Dems). That paradigm has passed away in the information age.

Now, political rhetoric frames our condition in apocalyptic terms; “the end of the American experiment,” “the demise of Madisonian democracy,” “deconstruct the administrative state,” “lock her up,” “build a wall,” “in bed with the Russians,” “Putin’s stooge,” “rid the country of radical Islamic terrorists,” etc.

Immigrants are not the problem. Fear of immigrants might be. Fake news is not news you disagree with; it’s a manufactured lie that’s disseminated as the truth. Turning back the clock on energy policy will not bring back coal mining jobs but education probably will create opportunities for new jobs.

There is room for disagreement over facts. We might disagree about when the world will become uninhabitable because of greenhouse gases, but when 97% of all scientists agree that it will happen if we don’t do something, the facts are not in dispute. Johan Norberg, in his book Progress: Ten Reasons to Look Forward to the Future, challenges us to review the evidence of positive change with an open mind and adopt a more optimistic, less apocalyptic, viewpoint.

Though Norberg is a Swedish journalist, my conservative friends can rest easy in knowing he is also a senior fellow at the Cato Institute, the libertarian think tank founded by the Koch brothers. In Progress, he urges us to moderate our fears, temper our hysteria, and acknowledge the monumental accomplishments that have made this a better world in the last 100 years.

Step by step, in 10 data-packed chapters, Norberg shows us how much improvement has been made in Food, Sanitation, Life Expectancy, Poverty, Violence, Environment, Literacy, Freedom, and Equality in the past 100 years. The evidence is impressive. We all agree that America can be better, but we don’t need draconian measures to “Make America Great Again.” America is great. If we all get out of our silos and read broadly across the “credible” spectrum of information sources, we can see that and we will all make better choices – liberal, conservative, or libertarian – in the future.

My friend, Deryl, abhors the “nanny state.” I’ve told him I think the nanny state is a myth; Americans are hardworking, more than all the other developed democracies in the world. Look at the productivity numbers (fact). Look at the number of hours worked (fact). We work our asses off but get less vacation time (fact), maternity leave (fact), family time (fact), and sick leave (fact) than any other developed country. I don’t see these productivity numbers as all positive but the numbers tell us the facts. And, yes, there are those among us who need help, but we have the resources to help them if needed. It makes all of us better when we lend a hand to those in need. If there is such a thing as a nanny state it’s the one that allows the rich to get richer while the poor among us struggle to pay for food, shelter, and healthcare.

When only 51% of the eligible voters show up to elect our president, we get a president elected by only 25% of the people. We deserve better than someone who only has the support of a quarter of its citizens.

Read the paper. Talk to your friends. Argue with those who disagree with you. Watch Fox News and CNN. Walk a picket line. Attend a protest march. Write your congressman or congesswoman. Challenge yourself to be an informed person. M and I gave our kids subscriptions to the Sunday New York Times for Christmas. They were getting their news online. It’s not the same. It’s important to see all the news – politics, sports, arts, financial – if you want to be an informed citizen. Trust traditional vetted sources – right or left.

As Nike says: Just Do It.

We deserve better than to be led by someone who doesn’t read and trusts Fox News more than his own CIA or FBI experts.