Is It Too Late For Lessons?

IMG_0590 When I was 12 years old I took clarinet lessons. From this distance I can’t remember if was my parents’ idea or mine. If it was mine it was because I loved the Sing, Sing, Sing track on the Columbia recording of Benny Goodman’s 1938 Carnegie Hall Concert. I could see myself playing like Benny in just a few short weeks. If the idea came from my parents it was because, like so many of their other ideas, they thought it would be good for me.

I always loved music – especially jazz – and the year before I started on the clarinet I bought a $10 ukulele out of the Sears Roebuck catalog and taught myself I Wanna Go Back To My Little Grass Shack In Kealakekua Hawaii and Ain’t She Sweet after first mastering the My Dog Has Fleas (G C E A) tuning on that four string beauty. The uke was great but the wood to wood tuning pegs were a bitch to keep in tune.

childrens_songs_-_ukulele_play-along_vol._4_book_cdIn any event, my parents got tired of My Dog Has Fleas and wanted me to learn to play a more traditional instrument. Maybe they even thought I had talent. No telling. My best guess is that they thought it would keep me busy while the hormone levels were rising. Maybe it did for a while, but the clarinet only lasted a few months. I hated the lessons on Saturday morning and I hated the teacher, Miss Cardinal, who taught students in her living room and wore a house dress, a cardigan sweater and sensible shoes. She was a spinsterish woman whose house smelled like spinster and cats. I don’t think she ever smiled, at least not at me, and when I failed to meet my own Benny Goodman standard I opened up her schedule for another aspiring clarinetist.

Two years later I had brief affair with another woodwind, the tenor saxophone, which I also thought was cool, but in spite of mastering a funky version of The Merry Widow Waltz in ¾ time it didn’t stick any better than the clarinet. By then it was clear to my parents that I didn’t have the concentration and staying power to master a musical instrument and they gave up on what was good for me.

I have another theory. When it comes to music or language – or the acquisition of difficult skills or the retraining of new neural pathways – there is a break-even point at which the pleasure of the endeavor has more power than the pain of failure. If you get to break-even you keep going; if you don’t, you don’t.

Ten years after the clarinet and saxophone experiments, in the fall of 1962, I was sitting outside a music store in Claremont, California, and heard Joan Baez’s ethereal voice for the first time. It was her first record and the Chase’s, the family that owned the music store, were friends and neighbors of the Baez family. Mr. Chase sold me my first guitar and an instruction book that afternoon. I took both of them home and started toward the break-even point. By Christmas I could play a couple of songs and play the chords in the key of E. Break-even time.

Malcolm Gladwell says that “The emerging picture (from such studies) is that ten thousand hours of practice is required to achieve the level of mastery associated with being a world-class expert—in anything,” (page 4, Outliers). Gladwell is often misquoted to the effect that 10,000 hours of practice can make you an expert – in anything. His examples of the “10,000 hour rule” are Bill Gates, the Beatles, Tiger Woods, and Kobe Bryant. This closer look at Gladwell’s dictum and Outliers shows that the underlying structure of the 10,000-hour rule is 10,000 hours of intense and focused practice.

10,000 hours I love the guitar; I’ve had several since the one Mr. Chase sold me – and I love guitar music – classical, jazz, rock, folk and country. I might even have 10,000 hours invested in practice, but it’s not the intense, focused effort Gladwell is talking about. My dirty little secret is that over the 50 years I’ve been playing I have taken only four lessons – two classical and two folk – and I experienced the same frustration and anxiety that I had with the clarinet and saxophone. I chickened out and quit. I hated not being good at it and was unwilling to put in the hard work to get there.

Last month a friend, who is about my age, asked me if I wanted to share his guitar teacher. He and his son-in-law had been alternating weeks with the teacher, but the son-in-law moved and he thought I might want to take his place. It caught me by surprise and I couldn’t think of a way to say No. The next week I went with him to his lesson and agreed to sign on. Scary. Sweaty palms. Clumsy fingers. Can’t keep the rhythm going. Brown-Eyed Girl. Norwegian Wood. Bo Diddely Beat. Clumsy everything – except when I play along with him. I can follow along if he keeps it simple and it sounds pretty good.

I haven’t played with anyone in 30 years. I play along with CD’s that hide my mistakes and I never have to hear myself alone, which is good. It sounds awful, to me, without the back up band.

George, the teacher, is very funky. The lessons take place in his bedroom/studio in a house he lives in with his wife and mother. They occupy the living room watching Dancing With The Stars while we wail away in a low-lit shag-rug bedroom/studio chocked full of guitars, music stands, CD’s, computers, drum machines and a king sized bed. The lesson last a half-hour, at which point my brain is fried and my fingers spastic. But I feel surprisingly good on the way home. Every two weeks is good. Not the same kind of pressure as if I had to do it every week. That might reprise the spinster/cat smells. I’m good for now.

Oh… and did I tell you I’m also taking tennis lessons and a short story writing workshop?

The Age of Consent

I’m not the first person to note that certain topics or controversies come in waves. Last week I wrote about documentary films and recommended several. Since then I’ve seen two more that pose important and complicated questions. Both of these films are essentially biographical but not straight biography. They explore the childhood and early lives of their subjects in order to shine a light on later events and behaviors and help us understand these two controversial personalities. At first they seem dissimilar but on closer inspection they are eerily alike.

One wouldn’t normally link the names of J D Salinger and Roman Polanski. One is a quintessentially American author while the other is a Polish filmmaker and survivor of the Holocaust. The subject matter of their respective arts is dramatically different, from Salinger’s attention to the details of coming of age in Catcher in the Rye to the wanton close-your-eyes scariness of Polanski’s Repulsion and Rosemary’s Baby. Then there are their dramatically different attitudes about celebrity and privacy. Salinger, widely regarded as a recluse, guarded his privacy like a spy while Polanski openly courts celebrity at film openings, festivals, and in glossy magazine interviews. They seem to have nothing in common.

Mr. Polanski’s sensational life has been a roller coaster of success, tragedy, scandal and flight to avoid prison. From his Krakow Ghetto escape as a child to the grisly Manson Family murder of his wife, Sharon Tate, his well publicized affair with 15 year old Nastassja Kinski, to his prosecution for the rape of a 13 year old LA girl and his flight to Europe in order to avoid prison time, his life has been a turbulent and controversial one played out on television and movie screens around the world. His encounter with the 13 year old happened 37 years ago but he is still a fugitive and a recurring news item, most recently with the release of the, now 50-year-old woman’s, book The Girl: A Life In The Shadow Of Roman Polanski.

Polanski

Salinger’s life, on the other hand, was shrouded in mystery. After exploding onto the literary scene with the publication of Catcher in the Rye, becoming a regular contributor to The New Yorker and being featured on the cover of Time Magazine he mysteriously moved up to a forested compounded near Cornish, New Hampshire, where he went to great lengths to maintain his privacy and anonymity. He died in 2010, almost 50 years after the publication of Franny and Zooey, his last published work.

JD Salinger billboard

So what is the connecting tissue for these two artistic giants of our time? Both were immensely successful and Polanski’s interest in young girls is well documented – from his affair with 15 year old Nastassja Kinski to the guilty plea for “unlawful sexual intercourse” with 13 year old aspiring model Samantha Gailey (now Geimer). What is less well known is Salinger’s interest in young girls – from Oona O’Neil (18 he was 25) to Jean Miller (14/30) to Claire Douglas (16/36) to Joyce Maynard (18/53) to Colleen O’Neill (30/70). His attraction to young girls was a constant throughout his life. His attraction and interest seems to me more complicated but no less questionable than Polanski’s.

I’m not qualified to make a judgment on Salinger’s psychological state but he, unlike Polanski, exercised some self control with these young women, at least in the early days of the relationships. If you read about Salinger and Jean Miller in Daytona Beach (1949) and then read A Perfect Day for Bananafish (1948) you might think he was researching the scene with Seymour and Sybil on the beach (also in Daytona), except that the story preceded the real life event. Was he working it out in prose in order to perfect the technique?

The subject never fails to elicit controversy and outrage, whether it happens in fiction or in real life. Nabokov’s Lolita (1955) was 12 in the novel. Stanley Kubrick raised her age to 14 for the film, but both the novel and the film had the country in an uproar and was (and still is) banned in some libraries.

What is the age of consent? I’m not trying to be provocative, but sexual mores, customs and attitudes differ significantly even among “developed” societies. In much of the world girls are considered women when they begin to menstruate. In Europe the age of consent varies from 13 in Spain, 14 in Germany and Austria, 15 in France, to 16 in Finland. In the North America it varies from 16 and 18. Polanski might not have been a felon with Samantha in Spain and was not a felon with Nastassja in France, though he would have been anyplace in North America. Salinger, on the other hand, who did not have sex with his young girls until they were older, would not have committed a crime anywhere.

But in these cases there is also a creep factor. I think I understand Polanski’s behavior better than I do Salinger’s. Polanski was a predator with Samantha. Salinger’s motivation, especially with Jean Miller and Claire Douglas, is creepier. Polanski’s behavior was criminal – drugs and alcohol were used to seduce a 13-year-old girl – no matter how mature, provocative or sexually active she was with her own age group. Salinger’s behavior is more complicated and looks to me like suppressed desire and a yearning for both innocence and sexual connection.

Montana Judge

Age, maturity, provocation, sexual experience and judicial action were thrust into the news in a recent Montana case involving a 54-year-old teacher convicted of raping his 14-year-old student. The student later committed suicide and the teacher was sentenced to 30 days in jail by a Montana judge who remarked that the girl was “older than her chronological age” and “as much in control of the situation as the defendant.” Most of America was outraged at the sentence and the judge’s comment. He later apologized, but the outrage continues. What about women teachers like Mary Kay Letourneau who had sex with her 12 year old student and Debra Lafave the Florida teacher who did the same with a 14 year old student.

The lines are not always clear; lovers don’t always look at birth certificates and physical attraction is not always high minded and rational. Are young girls more vulnerable to coercion than boys? Are boys more complicit when they are seduced? Should they be treated differently? Whatever the answers are, the questions will continue to present themselves, and we will continue to question the circumstances and make judgments about the behaviors when they do.

Montana Rape Case

Salinger, the documentary film (2013) by Shane Solerno is in theaters now.

Roman Polanski: Wanted and Desired, the documentary film (2008) is available for streaming on Netflix or on DVD from Amazon.

Changing Tastes and Film Formats

Darlene Love
The woman in the photograph is Darlene Love. I didn’t know her name or recognize her distinctive voice even though she was inducted into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame in 2010. Who is she and why didn’t I know her?

Darlene was primarily a back up singer and she; along with Lisa Fischer, Claudia Lennear, Merry Clayton and Judith Hill are the subjects of 20 Feet From Stardom, a must-see documentary now showing in theaters across the country.

These women are extraordinary and have extraordinary voices. They have all tried solo careers but failed to crack the barrier that separates stars from other talented artists. Merry and Lisa have both worked extensively with the Rolling Stones. Merry sings the duet on Gimme Shelter with Mick Jagger and Lisa, reputed to be the inspiration for Brown Sugar, has been the lead backup singer for every Rolling Stone record and tour since 1989.

These women have also worked with Bruce Springsteen, Luther Vandeross, Phil Spector, Ike and Tina Turner, Michael Jackson and more than once their studio work was misrepresented as the work of the more famous performer whose name was on the album.

This music and these voices are astonishing and I walked out of the theater last weekend thinking I’d like to go back and sit through it again. I might do it this weekend. Except…

Air Twyla

Tonight we’re going to see a new documentary about J.D. Salinger, Saturday we’re going to see and hear Twyla Tharp collaborate with R&B legend Allen Toussaint on Air Twyla at PNB, and Sunday we have tickets to see Robert Reich’s documentary Inequality for All. There is so much going on that there isn’t much time to work with.

Robert Reich

The personal computer, YouTube, cable TV, smartphones, and tablets have created a sea change in the way content is delivered and received, whether it’s music, film, news, or art. Included in the sea change is the ascendency of the documentary film as a main event in first run theaters. In June I blogged about two documentaries – Venus and Serena about the Williams sisters, and Anita, a film about Anita Hill and the Clarence Thomas nomination fight. Earlier I wrote about Searching for Sugar Man, the surprising story of Rodriquez, the Detroit musician who unknowingly provided the soundtrack for the apartheid struggle in South Africa.

In the past documentary films were shown, if at all, on PBS or weekends on CNN. Rarely were they seen in first run theaters. Now, they are being distributed and marketed by the likes of the Weinstein Company and competing with blockbusters like Iron Man and The Avengers. With documentary films we have an opportunity to see subjects explored in depth as an alternative to a diet of exploding aliens and car chases. These non-fiction films are informative and educational as well as good entertainment, but they can also be propaganda pieces like Dinesh D’Souza’s election cycle film 2016 that purported to show President Obama’s hidden Muslim agenda. In any event, documentary films have become frontline news and entertainment. Their ascendancy and importance reminds me of The Daily Show and The Colbert Report. I wonder if discerning people who now go there for real news in a satirical format without the mean spirited puffery of Fox or MSNBC wouldn’t rather have mainstream news that they trusted?

I live in a target rich environment for art, music, and film. It’s a great place to be, and now that summer is over local screens, music venues and galleries are filling with new and interesting work. I find myself increasingly drawn to the raft of non-fiction films that is flooding the mainstream. Salinger is getting the most publicity because of its subject’s obsession with privacy but Robert Reich’s film is getting a lot of hype too. There’s also one on the music scene in Muscle Shoals that celebrates Rick Hall the founder of FAME Studios where Aretha, the Stones, the Allman Brothers, Bono, Percy Sledge and others were backed by the remarkable studio musicians who created the famous Muscle Shoals sound.

I could go on and on about documentaries. If you’re interested there is a website devoted to top documentaries where you can watch them in their entirety. It’s a very deep well: http://topdocumentaryfilms.com.

♪This Is A Fine Bromance ♪

IMG_0544

This is Benny. He is 3 years old. We’re tight.Yes, his boots are on the wrong feet. You got a problem with that?

Image

Last Wednesday was Benny’s first day of “real” school. She’s an old hand.

IMG_0482

Benny and I man-up with an afternoon snack once or twice a week.

IMG_0536

Sometimes we lift weights and play games

Tough Guy

But, occasionally, we both get cranky

IMG_0405

And have to take a nap

IMG_0465

And then a bath

IMG_0549

Before our last story… and bedtime

Image

Tomorrow is another day for Opa and Benny. ♪ ♬ ♩This is a fine bromance ♫ ♬ ♪ Thanks, guy.

The Back Roads and Bike Trails of Summer

IMG_0518

It’s easy to survive Seattle this time of year. It’s not cold. It’s not even wet. These are the two elements I dread the most when the season changes. I’m spoiled. I’ve lived a life of privilege. I’ve moved around. I’ve picked great places and been blessed with good health. I think that in a perfect world I would ski for three months in the winter, hang out for three months on a tropical island somewhere and spend the rest of the year in and around home in Seattle. I’ll own it; Seattle is really not that bad – at least until the monsoon starts.

Part of my attachment to Seattle has to do with the bike. I’ve always had one. I’ve always used it, and it makes me feel good. I’ve ridden all around Western Europe, SE Asia and a lot of the US. At home I use it for exercise, transportation or just plain leisure fun. When I worked downtown I tried to ride the 20 miles to work at least once a week during the good months. I’m lucky to live right on the Burke-Gilman/Sammamish River Trail, a 50 mile long dedicated, multi-use, recreational trail and I’m also within pedaling distance of the 30 mile long Interurban Trail.

The Burke-Gilman is beautiful and sometimes Marilynn and I tell each other that if it was in France we would be raving about it, but since it’s right outside our door it doesn’t seem that special. This is what the trail looks like near where we live:

IMG_0487

But we aren’t tied to the Burke-Gilman. Yesterday we put our bikes on the car and drove 1 ½ hours north to Anacortes where we left the car and rode the bikes onto the San Juan Island ferry. An hour later we were pedaling through Friday Harbor on our way to a friend’s house 15 miles north on Westcott Bay. On summer weekends if the weather looks good we pick an island – Lopez, San Juan, Orcas, or even Vancouver Island – grab our gear, put the bikes on the car and drive to the ferry. All the islands have simple bike camping sites at state and county parks and there is a restaurant on each of them where the food is upscale and locally sourced. We leave home about 7am, spend the night on the island, eat a great meal in the local restaurant, and take the noon ferry back the next day. We’re gone less than 36 hours and we feel like we’ve been on a distant island adventure.

Here is what it looked like on our way to breakfast this morning –

IMG_0514

And this was our view from the restaurant –

IMG_0507

Tomorrow we’ll ride back to Friday Harbor, hop on the boat, pick up a fresh berry shake at the Fidalgo Drive-In in Anacortes, and be home by early afternoon. Not bad for a couple of urbanites.

During the week we use the bikes for transportation and shopping. We often ride to University Village to take an Apple class on iPhoto or Going Further on Your Mac, or ride to Fremont, Ballard, or Redmond for lunch or an afternoon latte. It’s an easy way to take an exercise break without hitting the weight room or pounding the pavement. Marilynn likes the shopping option too. She’s figured out that stuff can be delivered if it doesn’t fit in the panniers. Eileen Fisher loves her.

Recently bike safety has received a lot of critical attention around here and the creation of a safe network of trails and street lanes is climbing the list of civic priorities. I appreciate the Cascade Bicycle Club and other advocates who are helping make it easier and safer. The city has struggled with developing a bike lane system on crowded city streets, and given the financial and special interest constraints I think they’ve done a decent job. They can definitely do more and better, but being a savvy rider is important too. I’m really tired of the spandex and lycra wannabes who blast down the trail drafting on each other and scaring the bejeezus out of dog walkers and mothers with strollers. The Tour de France is a “road” race. If you want to train for it get off the trail. There are plenty of good country roads in the area where you can ride any speed for miles and miles. Please cool it on the multi-use recreational trail.

Summer is winding down. Next Monday is Labor Day, the unofficial end of summer, but September and October are also great months to ride – mild sunny days, changing colors, and fewer people on the roads (or trail). I’m planning to do some overnight trips to Coeur d’Alene, Chehalis, and Wenatchee after the holiday frenzy. All three of these destinations have well developed trail systems and fewer riders. I can’t wait.

I suppose there will come a time when I won’t be able to ride, but until then I’m planning to stay in the saddle and go. It’s hard to imagine a better way to get exercise, go shopping, be out with friends, or see the world.

Suivez-moi?