Surviving Seoul

Seoul PalaceAfter yesterday’s grinding 11 hour, three movie, flight from Seattle Marilynn and I landed at Incheon International Airport outside of Seoul and hopped the hour-long Korean Air Lines shuttle into the city. We had reservations at a three star hotel that I booked online, and for the first time in four years we are breaking up the trip to Saigon with a three day stay Korea. We’ve passed through Incheon International a half dozen times but neither of us has ever been into Seoul proper. It sounded like a great idea; Korea is booming – Samsung, Hyundai, Kia, L/G, Daiwoo – and new cities are being built from the ground up to handle the growth. Two years ago I blogged about Incheon International and suggested that it was the world’s best airport and our opinion of South Korea was bolstered by yesterday’s trip from the airport to the city in a comfortable new natural gas powered bus on wide, beautifully engineered, well-lit highways and causeways.

That was, however, the end of the honeymoon.

The KAL bus doesn’t stop at the New Kukje Hotel, the one I booked online. That should have set off some kind of alarm but it didn’t. On arrival in downtown Seoul we were casually offloaded with our four bags into the street in front of the Koreana Hotel, roughly two blocks from the New Kukje. The experience might have been different if we hadn’t been exhausted from the trip. It might have been different if it hadn’t been 32⁰F. It might have been different if we had packed light like we usually do, but we were packed for two climatic zones – winter in Korea and the 90⁰/90% heat of Saigon, as well as business in Saigon and vacation at the beach on Phu Quoc Island. It might have been different if the street we were standing in wasn’t six lanes across at rush hour with no crosswalk between the Koreana and the New Kukje, and it might have been different if we could have persuaded a taxi to take us the two blocks at any cost. But, it wasn’t different. In a Kafkaesque scene, we asked cab after cab to drive us the two blocks to the hotel and all of them pointed at the hotel sign and told us to walk. We could see the New Kukje sign from where we were. It might also have been different if any of the taxi drivers or the doorman at the Koreana had spoken some English. Yes, yes, I know, this sounds like an ugly American rant, but Seoul is an international business hub and I’ve traveled to a hell of a lot of primitive places where it was easier to get what I needed than it was last night.

But wait… there’s more. A cab driver did finally take pity on us and we loaded the bags and squeezed into the cab. As it turns out Seoul is a maze of one way streets and it took us ten minutes to navigate to the New Kukje where I happily paid the cabbie twice what he asked for. We were finally there, but “there” didn’t look even vaguely like the pictures on the website. The “New” Kukje is a one star hotel masquerading as a three star and the “New” in the name was probably true in 1975.

I thought Marilynn was going to kill me. The marble lobby of the New Kukje which was by far its best feature smelled like kimchi, not my favorite food to begin with. Getting off the elevator at our floor we noticed the dirty, frayed carpet and the dark narrow, twisty hallway that led eventually to our room which was heavy with the smell of cigarettes. But… wait there’s even more.

The Agoda website, where I made the reservation, promised a restaurant and a bar but the bar was non-existent and the restaurant manager told us they were no longer serving at 8pm. We ended up walking two blocks to the Texas Bar, begged for some peanuts which our perplexed waiter found and washed them down with two draft lagers. Back in the room, the two bottles of water provided by the management were gone in a heartbeat and there was no minibar to restock from. The only redeeming feature of the room was crisp white sheets and we gave up the quest for satisfaction after I let the front desk know we were leaving in the morning. I groggily went online and booked a room at the Koreana where this in-town odyssey began three hours before.

I wish I could say that today was better. We did manage to move out of the New Kukje after a little tiff over the length of our stay and traveled by taxi over to the Koreana. We took a quick city bus tour with a guide who didn’t know the population of the city or the name or purpose of a huge stone monument in one of the roundabouts. I think we knew almost as much as she did which was OK since there isn’t really that much to know about a big modern Asian city that has torn down most of its history. At 2:30pm we were turned away by five different restaurants because it was past lunchtime (and one who told us they couldn’t serve us because it was “break time”). Yes, God, there is a mandatory break time for employees at Shy Baby, the soul food restaurant in the Seoul Finance Center. I kid you not. Soul food in Seoul.

I’ve given a lot of thought to global citizenship and often wished that more Americans would do the same. I’ve lived in Germany, France, Vietnam and all four corners of the US. I value tolerance and celebrate differences, but Seoul is challenging the thin veneer of my global principles. I know there are good things happening here, just as I know even the best restaurants butcher the dining experience occasionally. I know the city will be easier on the eye when the leaves pop in the spring, the murky gray inversion lifts and those down parkas and knit caps come off, but I think I’ll give it a pass. I’ll have to be satisfied with a new Samsung Galaxy or Hyundai Sonata if that day ever comes. I’ll just know that hot new products are more important than communication or personal comfort in Korea and that might count for something. It’s time for me to move on to Vietnam where the people are poorer but more welcoming and where I know more about how things work.

Despite all the disappointments in Seoul I remind myself that being able to travel, to live in comfort, to have the gift of free expression, to have successful children, and to be healthy enough to enjoy all of them is an extraordinary gift mostly made possible by the gift of birth in America. Don’t let me forget this if I start to launch into another ugly American rant which I might do if I have to listen to much more from John McCain or Lindsey Graham.

“Amour” Is Hard Stuff…

Romeo and JulietteLast week was all about love – but sometimes love isn’t easy to watch or talk about. Great art is great because it taps into universal truth, but sometimes the truth, even as it is revealed in art, is hard to digest.

Over the last 10 days I’ve seen the following performances: Romeo and Juliette, the ballet, Rigoletto live from the Metropolitan Opera in HD, and Amour, the Oscar-winning Austrian film starring Emmanuelle Riva and Jean-Louis Trintignant. In spite of the fact that Valentine’s Day fell in there somewhere, it’s not a lineup that promotes optimism about love. All three stories are about love that ends badly. Valentine’s Day we celebrate love with red roses and chocolates but real life isn’t always roses and chocolates.

I saw the three performances in the order listed and that happenstance sequencing is interesting in its timeline of love. Romeo and Juliette is a story of first love and families in conflict. Rigoletto is about a father’s love for his daughter and his efforts to protect her from the lecherous Duke, and Amour is a voyeuristic, unvarnished look at a French couple’s love at the end of life.

The Pacific Northwest Ballet’s production of Romeo and Juliette, danced to the music of Prokofiev, is all about love. I’m not a big fan of Prokofiev’s score for the ballet. I like the lyrical, romantic Tchaikovsky version more, and I was imprinted by the Fonteyn/Nureyev pairing with the Tchaikovsky which I saw in San Francisco in the 1970’s. Nevertheless, Prokofiev, like Bernstein (West Side Story) captures the conflict with his punctuated dissonance without undermining the love story. This PNB production is magical. The sets are spare, abstract, geometric shapes, and the balcony scene is set on a long narrow ramp that rose up between these shaped backdrops. Like other R & J’s it is soft focused and romantic, all pastel colorings, and a clean almost clinical staging. It’s hard to see it as a tragedy but, after all, Shakespeare’s title is The Tragedy of Romeo and Juliet. Romeo and Juliet, whether it’s acted, danced, or sung, whether it’s the classic play or even the pop-rock Dire Straits song, is overwhelmingly set as a virginal romance with a tragic ending.

Verdi’s Rigoletto is different. Except for the music it’s not romantic but it is a love story that ends up with a twisted unexpected ending. In a botched effort to protect his daughter, Gilda, from the lecherous Duke of Mantua, Gilda, besotted by the Duke, decides to sacrifice herself to save her father and in a case of mistaken identity is killed. Nothing in opera is ever simple and the Met’s new production of Rigoletto, like Romeo and Juliette has been “updated.” Tony Award-winning director Michael Mayer has set the opera in 1960’s Las Vegas, with the Duke’s entourage based on Frank Sinatra and the Rat Pack. Hard to believe but true. And… it works if you’re not wedded to the original setting in 1500’s Mantua. The music is memorable and romantic, even if the update is a stretch and the end tragic.

On the other hand, there is nothing romantic about Amour. It is an unflinching look at George and Anne Laurent, a pair of retired piano teachers dealing with the indignities of old age. Over the course of the film Anne suffers two strokes and a botched operation and in the process extracts a promise from George that he will not send her back to the hospital or to a nursing home. The camera rarely leaves the couple except when their distracted, slightly annoyed and irritated daughter visits and urges him to put Anne in a nursing home. The daughter clearly cares but prattles on about her own problems not wanting to personally deal with or face the truth of her parents’ situation.

I think we all fantasize or at least naively hope that we and those that we love will pass quietly in our sleep and that everything will be in order and no mess will be left to clean up. It’s a fantasy. My wife is a consultant in senior healthcare and she reminds me frequently that the end of life is not pretty and that my intransigence about assisted living and nursing homes is all about the fantasy. I’m one of those in denial.

Amour is haunting. It’s hard to watch and impossible to forget. I’m sure my children won’t see it and would be bored if they did. They are like the Laurent’s daughter. They have their own lives, their own children, their own problems, and they don’t want to face the truth or deal with it when we, their parents, come to the very end. The truth is that we are close to that end. At 75 I know that my life and Marilynn’s will end sometime in the next 20 years but I don’t want to think about it. I hope it’s a quality 20 years and that we die in our sleep without pain. More fantasy. More denial.

We don’t want to burden our children or even talk to them about it, but the reality is that eventually our children will be pulled into the mess at the end. In earlier times families were involved in all phases of their integrated lives and there was an expectation that they would step up for each other including the messy parts at the end. I’d like to think that is still true, but I think it’s an extension of the fantasy.

Go see Amourif you want a reality check.

Chasing Snow

Big MountainI was born in Montana. My mother was born in Montana, and my paternal grandparents homesteaded a small farm in the Flathead Valley. Both my parents and my daughter graduated from the University of Montana. I’ve spent most of my life elsewhere, but maybe these associations are the reason I feel so connected to Montana.

Part of Surviving Seattle is finding ways to spice it up, so last week I left Seattle and drove East chasing snow. Three years in Vietnam had severely impacted my ski program and I was determined not to let another year go by without getting back on ‘em. I missed it and I’m spoiled. After almost thirty years in Ketchum/Sun Valley and Salt Lake City I like fresh powder and Seattle is not the place to find it.

On my first ski day on the road I managed to catch some new snow at Schweitzer Basin in northern Idaho, but it was too warm to be considered powder and I decided to move on to Montana where the prospects were better. I struck gold at Big Mountain in Whitefish and stayed for 5 days. Marilynn and I stayed at a great little B&B called Good Medicine Lodge just outside of town on the road to the ski area. The innkeepers, Woody and Betsy Cox, were welcoming hosts and the gourmet breakfasts were outstanding.

At Good Medicine I met two Canadian couples who had skied Big Mountain before and they let me tag along with them for a couple of days. Out of the 5 days in Whitefish I had 6-8” of fresh powder and blue skies 2 days and cut up powder and flat light for 3. Powder snow is like cocaine. Once you’ve had a hit you end up chasing the high – and 2 days out of 5 is pretty good.

Whitefish is a great little ski town. It reminded me of Ketchum in the 70’s – a cool place with a local vibe and no class distinctions. The people are friendly and unpretentious and the mountain is stellar. When the visibility is good Big Mountain is as good as it gets, but the mountain has a reputation for low clouds and fog and that means flat light in the open terrain at the top. On my second day the fog cleared and I realized I had been riding the chairlift over some of the most beautiful open slope powder covered terrain for a whole day without even realizing it. It would have been difficult to ski in flat light, but it showed me the positives and negatives of Big Mountain.

I wish I had more time to chase the snow this season. I’ll probably only end up with 10 to 15 days this year, because we’re headed back to Vietnam in a couple of weeks. Still, this was a good re-introduction to quality skiing. I ended up buying new skis and we’re already planning to meet the Canadian couples in Whitefish next year. Then it’s on to Big Sky and Bridger Bowl to see what they’re all about. Montana definitely has a lot to offer on the ski side. In fact, I like the whole package – the people, the little towns, the mountains, the Western feeling. I guess it’s no wonder that I feel connected there.

Sometimes I Think I’m Dreaming…

Sarah's KeyI wrote this in 2011 but recent events have reminded me of its timeliness.

Sometimes I think I’m dreaming… And, sometimes I imagine the nightmare on the flipside of my dream. In the dream I am a child of privilege – born healthy, of middle class white parents, in the middle of the 20th century in America. It’s all about timing and location. Too young to know the deprivation of the Great Depression. Too young to fight in WWII and Korea. Military service before Vietnam. Too old for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Two public universities while they were still free, and now receiving full Social Security and Medicare just as it was promised. I can’t imagine a better dream but it’s not a dream – it’s my reality.

So what’s the nightmare? In moments of existential angst I sometimes fear that I will be reincarnated as a Somali woman with three children, no food, no water, in a lawless barren landscape surrounded by the mercenary soldiers of some two-bit warlord who thinks humanitarian aid is a plot to take his puny little fiefdom away from him. That’s my nightmare, but it is reality for thousands of Somalis and Congolese.

My reality is someone else’s dream and my nightmare is someone else’s awful reality. I try to be mindful that my existence on this planet is a gift. I didn’t do anything to make it happen and it’s clearly not fair when Somalis by some malevolent role of the dice are malnourished, sick, and persecuted. Last night while I was driving to the gym I heard the story of a father who walked 300 miles in 30 days with his three sick, malnourished children to reach help in a refugee camp in Kenya. I drive half a mile to buy milk for my morning latte.

What’s my point? It’s really a question; given the misery, greed, suffering, and outright evil in the world is it possible to stay optimistic about the future of civilization? It’s not impossible for me but can that Somali woman be optimistic about chances that her children’s hunger and illness will be dealt with? Her whole being is focused on getting help for her children. It’s not about her own well being. Maybe she can’t act otherwise. Maybe, just maybe, we humans are hardwired to “believe” and not give up even when the odds are terrible.

The recent past is full of examples that support the other view. Newtown, Aurora, Tuscon, Virginia Tech all took place in our own well-healed country. You don’t have to look at the Cold War nuclear standoff or the battle between Muslim terrorists and the West to see the downside. In my lifetime the North Vietnamese tortured and killed their own countrymen when their loyalty was in question. Then, when they prevailed, they confiscated the property of their South Vietnamese countrymen and imprisoned them in “re-education” camps for up to 10 years. But, they didn’t kill their spirit and optimism. Many of those “losers” left the camps and risked everything in rickety boats to start a new life – optimistic that there was a future for them somewhere. And, for many, there was.

In the disturbing book and movie Sarah’s Key, by Tatiana de Rosnay, we watch the French police herding Jews into trucks for the Germans. 76,000 French Jews were sent to the extermination camps by their own countrymen. The Danes and the Dutch refused to do it, but the French sent their own people to die in the camps. Where is the case for optimism? The French were not illiterate Africans fighting for their own survival. They were one of the most literate, developed, and sophisticated cultures on the planet at the time.

There are so many contemporary examples of countrymen tormenting and torturing each other – Bosnia, Kosovo, Afghanistan, Iran, Gaza, Cote d’Ivoire, Somalia, and the Republic of Congo. Can we be optimistic in a world that acts like this? I’ve always considered myself a short term pessimist and long term optimist. I don’t know why or what I have to be optimistic about. It might just be the child of privilege legacy. Still… I believe we can do better. I will probably always have the nightmares, but I guess there’s a little of Sisyphus in all of us. We just need to keep pushing the boulder up the hill in the hope that when we get to the top it will stay there.

The Debate Over Zero Dark Thirty

Zero Dark ThirtyLet me go on the record – I thought Zero Dark Thirty was a great film. It doesn’t purport to be a documentary but it does claim fidelity to actual events surrounding the hunt for and eventual killing of Osama Bin Laden. Kathryn Bigelow, the director, was passed over by the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences in the 2013 run for the Best Director Oscar, and word on the street is that the opening scenes of “enhanced interrogation” and “extreme rendition” are behind the Academy’s snub.

I’m disappointed that the debate following the film’s release was hijacked by critics who made it about America’s use of torture rather than a portrayal of the drudgery and sifting of detail that is at the heart of modern intelligence gathering. Critics turned the debate into a morality tale in which the US became the bad guy when the outcome was actually the elimination of the most dangerous terrorist on the planet.

Did torture yield the critical piece? The CIA, FBI and others have complained that enhanced interrogation and extreme rendition, where torture is outsourced to other countries, was not responsible for eliciting a critical piece of intelligence that identified the courier that eventually led them to the Abbottabad compound where Bin Laden was holed up. Does torture produce actionable intelligence? Sometimes it might. Experts disagree about its efficacy but most do agree that a good interrogator can get the actionable intelligence without torture and that the information obtained through torture is eminently suspect because subjects will say anything to bring an end to the pain. I don’t know the “truth.”

There is no question that Alberto Gonzales, as Attorney General, prodded by Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld, authorized and sanctioned the use of waterboarding as an interrogation tool during those years. President Obama has made it clear and established policy to eliminate waterboarding and extreme rendition. Let the record reflect that I am not a supporter of torture, but at the time of these interrogations enhanced interrogation techniques and extraordinary rendition were sanctioned and authorized by the US government.

I don’t know what it’s really like to be tortured. I went through two survival schools – summer and winter – in the 1960’s. I was captured by the “aggressors” and taken to an interrogation compound where I was sleep deprived, left in a cell with no heat and an outside air temp of 15⁰F. I was interrogated under bright lights and when I refused to give anything but name, rank, and serial number I was placed in a small box (like the one shown in the film) and left for a few hours. It was no fun, and I don’t know how I would have fared had the situation been real. The point is that all enemy combatants use these techniques and worse. Let’s be clear; Zero Dark Thirty is not about the ethics of interrogation techniques. It is a damn good detective story about how the CIA tracked down the world’s most dangerous terrorist.

In addressing the critics of the film I like the words Hillary Clinton used in frustration the other day – “What difference at this point does it make?” We can’t rewind the clock and take back the active use of enhanced interrogation and extreme rendition. The world is not a black and white place, even though some would like to think it is. Since the end of the cold war and the advent of terrorism on a world scale the United States has been searching for a moral compass to guide its foreign policy. It wants to hold itself to a high moral standard while still protecting itself and its citizens. I think this film celebrates the hard work and perseverance that yielded a positive outcome. Let’s give the people who did it credit. After all it is a film about people. In the end, I believe a film’s importance is measured, at least in part, by the discussion it provokes. This isn’t a documentary; it’s a narrative film based on actual events and it is both art and fact. I think it’s a great one.