Herma Hill Schreter Kay (1934-2017)

Professor Herma Hill Kay died at her home in San Francisco on June 10, 2017. She was a respected teacher, colleague, and personality at Boalt Hall, the University of California’s law school in Berkeley for 57 years. After obtaining her undergraduate degree (magna cum laude) in anthropology from Southern Methodist University she attended the University of Chicago law school, and after a year as the law clerk for Roger Traynor, legendary Chief Justice of the California Supreme Court, she began her tenure as a law school professor at Boalt. I never had a class with Professor Kay and can’t claim her as a friend, but we did have one funny encounter in Seattle years after I left California.

In 1963 Professor Kay shocked the Boalt community by divorcing her first husband and marrying one of her students. It wasn’t so much a scandal as a curiosity. There was titillating gossip but no obvious backlash. She continued to teach and he continued on to graduation. With all the voyeurism, political correctness, and sexual politics in today’s air I can’t imagine what the school administration’s response would be nowadays. Nevertheless, the only public commentary I’m aware of occurred during the  law students’ annual theatrical when a verse was inserted in the score memorializing her action. Herma was a class act and her amused response to the song’s verse confirmed it.

I thought the song was so amusing I never forgot it, and in 2005 when she came to Seattle to host a fundraising luncheon I had a chance to refresh her memory by singing the verse to her during a Q&A after lunch.

Herma Hill Schreter Kay loved anthropology.

Shed her last husband without an apology.

Turned family law into more than mythology

While I was reading the regs.

Amusement and law school theatricals aside I’ve been a longtime admirer of Herma’s. She retired in 2016 after serving the Boalt Hall community for 57 years as teacher, dean, and advocate. She joined the faculty in 1960, two years before I started, and served as dean from 1992–2000. Berkeley was ahead of its time and so was she. At the time of her appointment, in 1960, she was one of only 13 women serving as full professors at major law schools. To Berkeley’s credit she wasn’t the first woman professor at Boalt. That distinction was held by Barbara Nachtrieb Armstrong, Herma’s mentor, who, in 1935, became the second woman to become a full professor at an ABA accredited law school.

While active at the school, Professor Kay taught family law, conflicts of law, and diversity in legal education. She wrote extensively, including a casebook co-authored by Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on Sex-based Discrimination, and when Sandra Day O’Conner, another friend and colleague, retired from the Supreme Court in 2006, Professor Kay was on the short list as her replacement.

Her marriage to the law student ended in divorce but she married again, had three children and four grandchildren, one of whom graduated from Boalt shortly before her grandmother’s death at age 82.

I was shocked to read her obituary in the New York Times this weekend and shocked to discover she was only two years older than I am. In retrospect, it shouldn’t have surprised me that she married a student. We were all about the same age, but because of her faculty position she seemed older – or at least more serious.

RIP Herma Hill Schreter Kay Brodsky

 

** Photos courtesy of NY Times and University of California

Friendship and Independence

Today we celebrate the 241st anniversary of America’s Declaration of Independence and the passing of the two political intellects most responsible for its drafting.

On July 4, 1826, on the anniversary of America’s independence, Thomas Jefferson and John Adams died. There is something remarkable and uncanny, something that enhances the written declaration, that its two most important contributors lived exactly 50 years to the day from the date of its publication. It’s as if they agreed, finally, that the principles embodied in the document were sound and durable enough to survive without their continued vigilance.

What may be equally remarkable is that these two political giants and founding fathers died as close friends after more than a decade of vitriolic hatred for one another. In the presidential election of 1800, Jefferson and his allies defamed Adams and in doing so caused a rift that lasted 11 years.

As John Dickerson pointed out on Sunday’s Face the Nation:

Jefferson and Adams didn’t communicate for 11 years until a mutual friend reminded them of their past, calling them the North and South Poles of the American Revolution. It didn’t take much. “A letter from you calls up recollections very dear to my mind,” wrote Jefferson. “It carries me back to the times when beset with difficulties and dangerous we were fellow laborers in the same cause.” They exchanged 150 letters after that.

What allowed them to knock off the crust of hatred was their love for a shared set of values. The Jefferson and Adams reconciliation matched their hopes for the nation. America would be able to survive the bad spells, partisanship and pride and abuse of power, because its citizens would keep their commitment to freedom, equality and justice and pull the country back on track.

The risky experiment is now 241 years old, only because each generation fault keep faith with the foundation that Jefferson and Adams laid.

I suppose I’m in the minority in that I enjoyed law school more than its practice, and one of the reasons is the respect it gave me for the genius of our founding fathers and the documents they crafted.

Once again, as in the early years of our republic, vitriol and partisan politics are in play. We are living in times that are challenging the genius of our founders. Principles and institutions are being stress tested by a President who is not a student of American history or government. It’s worth remembering that Jefferson and Adams were able to overcome their acrimonious differences and develop an enduring friendship. On this Independence Day I want to celebrate the country we live in and the foundation it is built on. Hopefully we can restore the balance of patriotic civility that Jefferson and Adams modeled.

Happy 4th of July.

Why Should You Care About This Man?

This is Garry Kasparov, a Grand Master and former World Chess Champion. Not only is he a master chess tactician, he is also a student of Vladimir Putin’s tactics. He knows Putin is a cagey, calculating, politically savvy, cold-blooded killer. He’s seen Putin’s enemies murdered – Alexander Litvinenko poisoned in London and opposition leader Boris Nemtsov shot four times in central Moscow days before the Russian election.

Kasparov’s is only one voice, but it’s worth listening to. What other voices should we be listening to in the acrimonious debate surrounding Russian interference in the American election? We need to know the truth, the Russian truth and the American truth. How do we go about identifying, sorting, and selecting from all the voices vying for attention ?

As America begins its investigation into the possible collusion of Trump campaigners with the Russian government to interfere in our election we need guidelines to help us evaluate the voices commenting on the case.

Historians love primary sources, so it’s worth mentioning that three Americans have interviewed Putin in the last two years – Charlie Rose, Megyn Kelly, and Oliver Stone. Stone’s four interviews begin airing on Showtime tonight (June 13, 2017). The Putin interviews are a good place to begin. I thought all of them, including the excerpts I’ve seen of Stone’s, had as much to say about the interviewer as they did about Putin, but the spymaster’s reactions, facial expressions, body language, and comfort with the process were revealing. (#KGB, #hesasnake). We see and hear him in action. He’s a calculating showman, better and smarter than Trump, and experienced at deception. What other voices are out there that should we listen to?

In spite of “fake news” and “alternative facts” I still believe there is such a thing as truth, and with an honest desire and perseverance we can discover it. It will take time and evaluating the credibility of disparate sources is a challenge. At this point in the unfolding political drama, here’s what we know for sure.

  • There was a Russian cyberattack on American institutions – 17 American agencies agree
  • It didn’t change the outcome of the election – most statisticians agree

We also know the Russian intervention contributed to the confusion, disruption, and polarization of American voters. We know that Putin is a KGB spymaster, suppresses dissent, murders critics, jails political opponents, invades Crimea, and uses his forces to support Assad in Syria.

Why doesn’t every American want to know what he did to interfere in the American election? What was his objective? Who benefitted from the intrusion? Why would any American try to prevent an investigation? I want to know; shouldn’t every American?

I believe Robert Mueller, the Special Counsel, will ferret out the truth, but I’m not content to stand by and wait for his findings. I’m going to follow along and do my own due diligence; analyze sources and work my way toward the truth? Who should we listen to? What are their biases? What are the outcomes they are hoping for? How will those outcomes affect America and Americans going forward?

I want to be even handed in evaluating sources, while admitting my liberal bias. I want to be fair and look at both sides of the conversation. My primary sources are columnists in the New York Times, Washington Post, Atlantic, Vanity Fair, New Yorker, and Esquire, what Trump would call mainstream “fake news,” but I also read the Weekly Standard and National Review. I try to select from sources close to the middle.

I read Thomas Friedman (Democrat) and David Brooks (Republican) at the NY Times, David Ignatius (Democrat) and George Will (Republican) at the Washington Post, William Kristol (conservative) at the Weekly Standard and Rich Lowry (conservative) at the National Review.

Like President Trump, I watch a lot of cable TV but I try to balance it with written commentary as well. I have a limited tolerance for Fox News. It’s a shambles after the Ailes/O’Reilly scandals and the defection of Megyn Kelly and Greta Van Susteren. I can’t watch the nerdy bullying of Tucker Carlson or angry hostile apostasy of Sean Hannity, but I still tune in for Bret Hume or Fox and Friends.

My real go-to news programs start with Republican Joe Scarborough’s Morning Joe and end with Democrat Brian Williams 11th Hour on MSNBC. I watch Rachel Maddow but temper her excesses with the knowledge that she’s on the far left of my center-left spectrum. What I appreciate about MSNBC’s coverage is the inclusion of current and former government officials who have no skin in the game and whose veracity I trust – people like former CIA chiefs Mike Hayden and Bob Gates, former CIA and Defense Department Chief of Staff Jeremy Bash, former Bush Homeland Security advisor Fran Townsend, and former FBI counter-intelligence agent Clint Watts. I trust these men and women. They are my vetted sources.

I don’t read the political stuff that shows up on my Facebook feed, though it might seem to be in my wheelhouse. I don’t know if it’s real or fake news and I don’t think Facebook does either. I want an established entity standing behind the reporters and their sources. My primary go-to cable program is Morning Joe. With everyone from Rick Tyler (Cruz man), Elise Jordan (Bush White House) David Ignatius (Washington Post), Steve Rattner (economist and Obama’s Task Force on the auto industry), Jon Meacham (Presidential historian), Mark Halperin and John Heilemann (co-managing editors of Bloomberg Politics) as regular contributors there’s wide coverage of the political spectrum.

In this season of political bickering, the hint of impeachment, Special Counsel, obstruction of justice and multiple ongoing investigations it’s good to know how to think about these things. Garry Kasparov cautions us with Ronald Reagan’s words, “Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction.” Then he adds, “A dictator only cares about his survival, political and physical. You may call it the ‘strategy of survival,’ but it’s purely tactical. The advantage of democracy over dictatorship is that democracy can afford long-term planning.” We have 240 years of democratic government; Putin has 17 years as a heavy handed autocrat.

Here’s my final word: even if you are tired of hearing the endless repeats, take heart and listen to Steve Perry on Journey’s 1981 rock hit Don’t Stop Believin’ the sentiment is a good one. Stay the course and vet your sources.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VcjzHMhBtf0),

Don’t Stop Believin’

The End of the Beginning

Tomorrow (Thursday June 9, 2017) is The End of the Beginning, a big day in the unfolding of America’s future. I, for one, am taking the day off. I need to watch former FBI Director James Brien Comey Jr.’s testify to the Senate Intelligence Committee.

Comey’s testimony is not the end of this tortuous period in our democracy, but it will be a turning point. We are far from the end of this Constitutional puzzle. Will the President be cleared of wrongdoing or will the Russian saga end in impeachment or prosecution? Was Trump colluding with the Russians to disrupt the 2016 election? Is he in deep trouble with the Russian banks? Do they have him by the short hairs? Will he self-destruct? Will the Republicans finally stop ignoring and apologizing for his erratic, ignorant, dangerous rants? However it ends it will be a turning point in the contemporary struggle for the soul of the republic. I’m all in until it’s over.

For 138 days we have been observer-victims of the drip, drip, drip of intelligence leaks. Prior to the election it was the drip, drip, drip of Russian intelligence leaks aided by the self-cloistered Julian Assange dripping Russian hacked, Wiki-leaking Clinton emails from the Ecuadorian Embassy in London. Since the election it has been the drip, drip, drip of US intelligence and White House leaks concerning the secretive shenanigans of the Trump administration thanks to what has to be the golden age of investigative journalism.

On January 26, 2017, six days after the Trump inauguration, Acting Attorney General Sally Yates met with President Trump to advise him that General Mike Flynn, the National Security Advisor, lied about his conversations with Russian operatives and was thereby vulnerable to blackmail by them. Trump allowed Flynn to continue in his role as NSA for 18 days until it was revealed that he had also lied to VP Pence about his Russian connections. At that point Flynn was fired. Why did it take 18 days to act on Sally Yates information? The Trump team has yet to answer that question.

In the 115 days since Flynn’s firing the White House has been under siege and under investigation. Americans are dying to know why Trump and his associates had so many unreported meetings with Russian operatives (especially the 3 Sergei’s – Ambassador Kislyak, Foreign Minister Laverov, and banker Gorkov) before and after the election.

Why did AG Jeff Sessions, son-in-law Jared Kushner, advisor Carter Page, former Blackwater CEO and Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos’ brother Eric Prince, former campaign manager Paul Manafort, gadfly advisor Roger Stone and others all conceal their encounters with Russian officials and emissaries? It’s a veritable rogues’ gallery of Trump associates.

Why did Trump honor Putin’s request to entertain Kislyak, Laverov, and the TASS news team in the Oval Office and exclude all US media? It’s hard evidence of Putin’s leverage over Trump.

We may never know the answer to these questions. Special Counsel Robert Mueller may keep the contents of recorded conversations and other surveillance under wraps, but soon we will know a lot more about those meetings and their purpose. With four investigations – House, Senate, FBI, and Special Counsel – digging into the Russia scandal we’re likely to part the smoke to see the fire beneath it all.

Was Trump himself compromised during his earlier visits to Russia as the Christopher Steele dossier claims? Did Flynn promise the Russians the new administration would lift the sanctions? Did Trump direct him to assure the Russians everything would be fine after he took office? Did Trump obstruct justice by asking the DOJ, CIA, DNI, and FBI to drop the Russia investigations. Is this where the real power lies now?

Tomorrow signals the end of the beginning; fired FBI Director Comey set to testify in open session to the Senate Intelligence Committee about his personal encounters with President Trump and the reputed presidential attempts to co-opt his investigation, loyalty, and personal honor.

In the last few days the President has seemed increasingly unhinged, tweeting ceaselessly about the TRAVEL BAN (his caps), fake news, Comey’s upcoming testimony, his unhappiness with Jeff Sessions, attacks on the Mayor of London, and the end of Obamacare. Tomorrow should be interesting. Will he live-tweet as the Intelligence Committee receives Comey testimony? If so, it’s not likely to help his case with the committee or the Special Counsel just as his travel ban tweets are likely to be used against him in the Supreme Court. Nevertheless, that hasn’t stopped him from sounding off in other situations. Hear ye, hear ye, hear ye; the President of the United States wants to be heard.

Yikes!!!

 

Nashville: Skyline and All

“If you’re travelin’ in the north country fair

Where the winds hit heavy on the borderline

Remember me to one who lived there

For she was once a true love of mine.”

Both Bob Dylan and the Nashville skyline have changed since he wrote those words for the Nashville Skyline album in 1969. I loved the record (yes, it was a record in those days), and I loved his surprising shift from folk-protest to traditional country music including an off-pitch duet with Johnny Cash. Beyond that I didn’t know much about the city except that it was the home of the Grand Ole Opry. I had never been there and neither had M, but a chance meeting with a young couple at a Peter Cetera concert in Seattle got us thinking about a visit to their hometown. So, on impulse, with an Alaska Airlines companion ticket to burn, we booked the flight as just the right destination for an escape from our long wet winter in Seattle.

Based on recent events – United Airlines dragging an injured, bloody, paying passenger off its airplane, an American Airlines flight attendant pushing and verbally abusing a young mother and Delta booting a family off in a dispute over a seat they had paid for… it looked like the home team – Alaska Airlines– was the right choice. And, it was.

What a treat, a non-stop flight from the Emerald City to Music City. Wide cabin 737-900. No intermediate stops. No physical or verbal abuse. Cordial gate agents. Friendly flight attendants. On time departure. A real surprise.

And, Nashville itself was an even better surprise – a lovely city with giant tulip poplar trees shading well-manicured lawns and stately homes set back from the street. I don’t know what I expected but it didn’t include this kind of genteel understated residential elegance. To be sure there are portions of the city that are not so well maintained but we admired many homes and neighborhoods like this one near our Airbnb home.

What I did expect was lots of music and I wasn’t disappointed. Broadway is the main drag for the younger crowd; bars and honky-tonks cheek by jowl within throwing distance of Ryman Auditorium, the original home of the iconic Grand Ole’ Opry. But, there are better less crowded venues like the Bluebird Cafe in Green Hills and Third and Lindsley in The Gulch, where local session musicians play with emerging talent every night.

I was never a fan of the old Nashville country music scene with its sequined suits and twangy rhythms – Porter Wagoner and Roy Acuff – but I’m a big fan of later trends starting with Johnny Cash and Kris Kristofferson and on to Keith Urban and Sheryl Crow. Today, the city offers music of every genre and every taste. On Friday night of our weeklong stay we made it over to Musician’s Corner in Centennial Park to hear five talented singer-songwriters take the outdoor stage and sing their hearts out while families picnicked, kids ran around on the lawn and food trucks dished up catfish tacos, salted caramel ice cream, and other treats.

Nashville was everything we hoped it would be – a connection to the American past (Civil War history and Andrew Jackson’s Hermitage), a musical odyssey (Country Music Hall of Fame and new talent), food choices from BBQ (Martin’s) to upscale modern (Henrietta Red), and the best lattes east of the Mississippi (Frothy Monkey).

M and I thought one week would be plenty of time to see and experience Nashville. We were wrong and I think we’ll go back. In addition to a dynamic roots music scene there is the Nashville Symphony, a thriving visual arts community, the Predators ice hockey team (currently in the NHL Stanley Cup finals), craft breweries, 200-year-old whisky (Scottish spelling) distilleries, and a renowned letter press typesetting shop (Hatch) – all worth visiting. We’ll be back.

Here’s a view of that “other” Nashville skyline, the one that Johnny Cash and Bob Dylan could never have imagined 48 years ago.

PS: It’s worth mentioning that in spite of its location in the Bible Belt, Nashville is a blue city. In 2016 it voted 59% for Clinton 34% for Trump and 4% for Gary Johnson while the State of Tennessee went overwhelmingly for Trump. For Left Coast liberals, like us, it’s a safe zone though we did hear there are still a few Confederate generals standing on pedestals.

PSS: Bob Dylan delivered his Nobel Prize acceptance speech yesterday (June 5, 2017) – right on deadline.